Throughout trial and error, Nature developed the best-prepared systems in order to face the adversities of the environment. It created mechanisms of evolution, perfecting them until achieving the structures of the biological system: multicellular organisms interacting with each other from the development of their unique potential, and looking for one and the same result: harmonic life (homeostasis) and transcendence (reproduction).
The nervous system and cellular mitosis are keys to developing a social system worthy of those who for millions of years have set out to discover the best mechanisms for efficiency such as the fractality and the organic networks of Planet Earth.
The Earth is the largest known biological living being in development. Its biodiversity mirrors the internal abundance of the organisms inhabiting it. Human beings operate for the Earth in the same way as the cognitive thought is doing within our nervous system. Our cultures and civilizations are an evolutionary response to the search of the own conscience of who one is.
Therefore, our society must function on the basis of the cellular nervous system, in order to act consistently with the organism in which we live.
The nervous system and cellular mitosis are keys to developing a social system worthy of those who for millions of years have set out to discover the best mechanisms for efficiency such as the fractality and the organic networks of Planet Earth.
The Earth is the largest known biological living being in development. Its biodiversity mirrors the internal abundance of the organisms inhabiting it. Human beings operate for the Earth in the same way as the cognitive thought is doing within our nervous system. Our cultures and civilizations are an evolutionary response to the search of the own conscience of who one is.
Therefore, our society must function on the basis of the cellular nervous system, in order to act consistently with the organism in which we live.
Ontrocracy comes from the Greek words
Ontos and Cratos: the Power of the Being.
“Being” is interpreted as the set that composes an individual holistically, from its biological, emotional, spiritual, cultural, and philosophical aspects.
In turn, it interprets that each individual is part of a greater Being, whom we call people, society or civilization.
Therefore, the key is the interconnectivity between the parts resonating with the same purpose, thus seeking (as a priority) enrichment as well as emotional and intellectual development, through the exchange.
Ontrocracy comes from the Greek
words Ontos and Cratos:
the Power of the Being.
“Being” is interpreted as the set that composes an individual holistically, from its biological, emotional, spiritual, cultural, and philosophical aspects.
In turn, it interprets that each individual is part of a greater Being, whom we call people, society or civilization.
Therefore, the key is the interconnectivity between the parts resonating with the same purpose, thus seeking (as a priority) enrichment as well as emotional and intellectual development, through the exchange.
Bio-Evolutionary refers to the condition of the State or
Organism and its form: flexible, adaptive, organic,
and cooperative.
We must take social networks as the natural development that is driving us to collaborative non-hierarchical interconnectivity, in the same way as nervous networks. The key to this system is Fractality: it is replicable in all areas and levels, going beyond state limits.
The Evolutionary Ontocratic System lays its main foundations in the generation of trust between individuals, their diversity and the appreciation of their innate resources. It respects the origins: religious, sexual, cultural or philosophical, since it only sees individuals making up a network whose most important value is the ability to propose solutions and improve structures without going against those already active.
Bio-Evolutionary refers to the
condition of the State or Organism
and its form: flexible, adaptive,
organic, and cooperative.
We must take social networks as the natural development that is driving us to collaborative non-hierarchical interconnectivity, in the same way as nervous networks. The key to this system is Fractality: it is replicable in all areas and levels, going beyond state limits.
The Evolutionary Ontocratic System lays its main foundations in the generation of trust between individuals, their diversity and the appreciation of their innate resources. It respects the origins: religious, sexual, cultural or philosophical, since it only sees individuals making up a network whose most important value is the ability to propose solutions and improve structures without going against those already active.
In this regard, the Ontocracy is a system that recognizes, respects, and integrates each and every one of the worldviews, through the sum of our innate individual capacities. It strengthens our confidence and considers us responsible for both actions and joint decisions towards the resolution of common conflicts, valuing, regardless of the origin, the contributions of those who choose to participate. Therefore, it makes us absolutely responsible for any decision of a public nature, since it eliminates all hierarchy and/or intermediary, in order to achieve and fulfill various projects or solve problems. It involves us as an active part of the economy of the system, the judicial apparatus and the executive; each of us being investors of our own nation. It allows us to participate internationally and on behalf of each individual, in decision-making without the intervention of the particular interests of each nation.
It is also a flexible articulation system in case of decision making; therefore, its laws and regulations represent a security framework without obstacles or impediments. Each project, as long as it is financed and finds corresponding agents, is considered for its development and implementation.
The Ontocracy recognizes the need for an educational change and incorporates new technologies taking care of the aspect of human interaction. Likewise, it proposes an electoral system based on experience, knowledge, and trust, since it rejects partisanship or ideology.
Finally, we can conclude that the evolutionary ontocratic system seeks to improve the social individual. From his participation and observance in the political-economic decisions that involve him, he has the freedom to collaborate or offer his contribution in what he wants or feels, in order to promote a fully active society with the capacity for analysis and decision.
In this regard, the Ontocracy is a system that recognizes, respects, and integrates each and every one of the worldviews, through the sum of our innate individual capacities. It strengthens our confidence and considers us responsible for both actions and joint decisions towards the resolution of common conflicts, valuing, regardless of the origin, the contributions of those who choose to participate. Therefore, it makes us absolutely responsible for any decision of a public nature, since it eliminates all hierarchy and/or intermediary, in order to achieve and fulfill various projects or solve problems. It involves us as an active part of the economy of the system, the judicial apparatus and the executive; each of us being investors of our own nation. It allows us to participate internationally and on behalf of each individual, in decision-making without the intervention of the particular interests of each nation.
It is also a flexible articulation system in case of decision making; therefore, its laws and regulations represent a security framework without obstacles or impediments. Each project, as long as it is financed and finds corresponding agents, is considered for its development and implementation.
The Ontocracy recognizes the need for an educational change and incorporates new technologies taking care of the aspect of human interaction. Likewise, it proposes an electoral system based on experience, knowledge, and trust, since it rejects partisanship or ideology.
Finally, we can conclude that the evolutionary ontocratic system seeks to improve the social individual. From his participation and observance in the political-economic decisions that involve him, he has the freedom to collaborate or offer his contribution in what he wants or feels, in order to promote a fully active society with the capacity for analysis and decision.
